bwh: (Default)
[personal profile] bwh

Heard as I was waking up: 30 kg of plutonium is unaccounted for at Sellafield. But the audit "does not represent any material going missing", according to the DTI. So that's OK then. Obviously they have another set of accounts that explains it all, but which they can't show us, since otherwise they couldn't possibly know.

For reference, that's 7 bombs' worth.

Date: 2005-02-17 09:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songster.livejournal.com
Hmmm, not sure I agree with you.

Remember, they're processing spent fuel to extract plutonium. "Material unaccounted for" could simply be the difference between what they expected to recover from the fuel rods and what they actually did recover. Possibly the stuff being sent to then simply contains less plutonium than expected?

I don't find it beyond the realms of possibility that they can prove they haven't had anything taken from the plant, yet not be sure why they have less plutonium than they should. The last paragraph of the report would seem to indicate this is the issue here.

Date: 2005-02-17 11:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artela.livejournal.com
The news report I heard on R4 this morning intimated that the problem may be with "inaccuracies in measurements during recovery"... if the inaccuracies are all in the same direction then that could account for such a discrepancy.

Date: 2005-02-18 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] womble2.livejournal.com
It seems like a strange kind of audit then, or maybe it's just typically distorted reporting.

February 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223 242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 10:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios